Be Specific About Based On Books Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
| Title | : | Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil |
| Author | : | Hannah Arendt |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 312 pages |
| Published | : | December 7th 2006 by Penguin Classics (first published May 17th 1963) |
| Categories | : | History. Nonfiction. Philosophy. Politics. World War II. Holocaust. War |
Hannah Arendt
Paperback | Pages: 312 pages Rating: 4.22 | 14701 Users | 1153 Reviews
Narrative In Favor Of Books Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
Originally appearing as a series of articles in The New Yorker, Hannah Arendt’s authoritative and stunning report on the trial of Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann sparked a flurry of debate upon its publication. This revised edition includes material that came to light after the trial, as well as Arendt’s postscript directly addressing the controversy that arose over her account. A major journalistic triumph by an intellectual of singular influence, Eichmann in Jerusalem is as shocking as it is informative—an unflinching look at one of the most unsettling and unsettled issues of the twentieth century that remains hotly debated to this day.
Identify Books Conducive To Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
| Original Title: | Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil |
| ISBN: | 0143039881 (ISBN13: 9780143039884) |
| Edition Language: | English URL https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/320983/eichmann-in-jerusalem-by-hannah-arendt/ |
| Characters: | David Ben-Gurion, Reinhard Heydrich, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Adolf Eichmann, Heinrich Müller, Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Gideon Hausner, Rudolf Kastner, Moshe Landau, Robert Servatius, Edmund Veesenmayer, Dieter Wisliceny |
| Setting: | Jerusalem(Israel) |
Rating Based On Books Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
Ratings: 4.22 From 14701 Users | 1153 ReviewsCritique Based On Books Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil
In true Arendt style, the writing is concise, each sentence crafted beautifully, the subject matter studied from all sides. In some cases, she even comes to Eichmann's defense against the things he had been accused of that he hadn't done. To her, it was very important for him to be tried for his own crimes, and his own crimes only, which is a very hard thing to do considering the complexity of the German bureaucracy and the enormity of the Jewish (and other peoples') genocide. Required readingWe just saw the movie Hannah Arendt , and it is extremely good - possibly the best thing I've seen this year. Margarethe von Trotta's direction and script are excellent, and Barbara Sukowa is terrific in the title role.
Eichmann in Jerusalem by Hannah Arendt is a thought-provoking, if dense, history of the Adolf Eichmann, the major organizer of Hitler's "Final Solution" -- the extermination of every living European Jew. Coupled with some meditations of a first-rate thinker and author on politics, morality, and the gray line that exists between law and justice. Whereby legal means often impede justice, and just causes often illegal.First off, a few mentions of the text. Arendt was a German-born Jew living in
This book is amazing. In it, Arendt struggles with three major issues: 1) the guilt and evil of the ordinary, bureaucratic, obedient German people (like Eichmann) who contributed to the attempted genocide of the Jewish people, 2) the complicity of some jews in the genocide (through organization, mobilization, passive obedience, and negotiations with the Nazis, 3) the logical absurdity the Eichmann and Nuremberg Trials, etc. In this book (and the original 'New Yorker' essays it came from) Hannah
It is hard to know what to say about this book. The subtitle is pretty well right: the banality of evil. Eichmann comes across as a complete fool, utterly lacking in any ability to see things from the perspective of the other. As Arendt says at one point, the idea that he could sit chatting to a German Jew about how unfair it was that he never received a promotion for his work in exterminating the Jews pretty much sums up the man. It seems Eichmann felt he was doing his best not only for his
A truly disturbing look at what motivates individuals to follow orders. While there are some who may disagree with some of the conclusions that Hannah Arendt draws I still think this is a groundbreaking study in the connection betweeen conformity and criminal compliance.
This book disturbed my peace with the universe. I read it while I was working on a death penalty case some years back, mostly on the bus too and from work. It led to me spending no little time starring out the window. Trembling ontologically.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.