Present Epithetical Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Title | : | Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| Author | : | Ludwig Wittgenstein |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 142 pages |
| Published | : | September 1st 2001 by Routledge Classics (first published 1921) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Logic. Classics. Humanities. Language. Linguistics. European Literature. German Literature |
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Paperback | Pages: 142 pages Rating: 4.07 | 15411 Users | 590 Reviews
Narration To Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Perhaps the most important work of philosophy written in the twentieth century, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein published during his life. Written in short, carefully numbered paragraphs of extreme brilliance, it captured the imagination of a generation of philosophers. For Wittgenstein, logic was something we use to conquer a reality which is in itself both elusive and unobtainable. He famously summarized the book in the following words: 'What can be said at all can be said clearly; and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence.' David Pears and Brian McGuinness received the highest praise for their meticulous translation. The work is prefaced by Bertrand Russell's original introduction to the first English edition.Point Books Conducive To Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Original Title: | Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung |
| ISBN: | 0415254086 (ISBN13: 9780415254083) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Epithetical Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Ratings: 4.07 From 15411 Users | 590 ReviewsCommentary Epithetical Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Sure, it's not the easiest thing to comprehend given Wittgenstein's autistic-child writing style, and sure, it's not something I agree with that often, given both my materialist leanings and my greater love of Wittgenstein's later repudiations of his earlier work. Is this important and influential? God yes. Does that make it worth reading? Probably. Did I enjoy it? No, not at all, especially given that the logical positivist program it inspired -- while equally important and influential --A beautiful little book about language and thought, done in by Wittgenstein's lack of mathematical training to this point (it was written in the trenches of the Austro-Hungarian ostfront and the Italian POW camps of Cassino, and published only with the help of Russell and Ogden -- indeed, Ogden gave the book its title). Look to the Philosophical Investigations for "Wittgenstein II", the much more useful side of Ludwig's career (well after he'd left Logical Positivism behind), but read the
David Markson made some funny aphorisms regarding Harold Bloom's claim to The New York Times that he could read 500 pages in an hour (highly dubious):"Writer's arse.Spectacular exhibition! Right this way ladies and gentlemen! See Professor Bloom read the 1961 corrected and reset Random House edition of James Joyce's Ulysses in one hour and thirty-three minutes. Not one page stinted. Unforgettable!... What's this? Can't spare an hour and a half? Wait, wait. Our matinee special, today only! Watch
What the hell am I supposed to say about this?The parts I understood were hugely inspirational to my own thoughts, if I did indeed understand those parts, which I suspect I did not.What a shame that someone so clever who had decided that this book was the be-all and end-all to problems in philosophy could only communicate them in a form that often eludes human comprehension.It's like the saying that if the human brain were simple enough for us to understand it then we would be too stupid to do
Like many young American readers, I made the mistake of reading the bulk of this text in an In-N-Out, and now it is difficult for me to think about elementary propositions without thinking about someone ordering a cheeseburger, and, subsequently, thinking about the relationship between the sign of "cheeseburger" and the atomic fact of the cheeseburger it refers to. Wittgenstein orders his cheeseburger with the totality of everything that is the case. And he eats the whole thing in under 100
Get your P's and Q's ready, folks, because we're in for the ride of our lives. Or not.Wittgenstein was living proof that androids were around and functioning during WWI. That at least this single android had a sense of humor dry enough to turn the Mariana Trench into the Mojave Desert, too.Or was this a joke at all? Let's see.Most of the numbered propositions were imminently clear and devoted to a single purpose: describing reality.Language is the big limiter, which should never be a big
The Tractatus is a mesmerizing pile of poo. I spent a semester trying to understand whatever it was that Wittgenstein seemed to have stumbled upon... it turns out that this is just nothing more than an engineer writing bad poetry. Crap. Absolute crap.."Whereof that which we cannot speak we must pass over in silence." What the devil is this? It's a coward's way out. Translation: "I can't roll with the big dogs so I'm going to take my ball and go home."If you want to read some philosophy, go
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.