Itemize Epithetical Books Immortal (Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9)
| Title | : | Immortal (Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9) |
| Author | : | Christopher Golden |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 320 pages |
| Published | : | May 1st 2000 by Simon Pulse (first published January 1st 1999) |
| Categories | : | Media Tie In. Buffy The Vampire Slayer. Fantasy. Paranormal. Vampires. Young Adult. Fiction |
Christopher Golden
Paperback | Pages: 320 pages Rating: 3.84 | 1442 Users | 45 Reviews
Relation In Favor Of Books Immortal (Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9)
DNF at 53%This is supposedly one of the best Buffy novels out there, with the supposed dream team of Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. I can definitely see why the fanbase praises these authors, especially considering these writers come out with books at almost the same speed of Stephen King. However, though there is enjoyment to be found in this book, the vast majority of my reaction was "Okay, that was cool, but..."
I'll do my best to break it down.
Dialogue vs. Character
Christopher Golden's media tie-ins are praised for their dialogue, with Buffy probably being the highest praise of his vast portfolio. And it's true that the dialogue of this book sounds like something Joss Whedon would write, matching each character perfectly. However, though the characters speak like they do on the show, they don't act like they do on the show.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer is, at its core, a Monster of the Week show. This means that there is a formula: Monster shows up, Buffy fights monster but loses the first time, Giles pools his resources, Buffy then fights monster again with brains rather than brawn, the end. Add in the bits here and there where one would think, "Oh, Willow would say something like this about that," or, "Xander would make a joke here."
Those little details are in here, but they're flat and forced, almost no motivation to make the character speak other than the writers thinking "They would say something here." Add in the fact that dialogue from the visual medium is simplified compared to those of novels, every character ends up feeling a bit flat and uninteresting. This is also due to...
Storytelling: Movies/TV vs. Books
Screenwriting is very different from writing a novel (Don't let J.K. Rowling's screenplays fool you). When you're writing for film or TV, you can't write about what the character is thinking unless you are planning to show a visual representation of the thought or have voice over (the latter only working in comedy and/or drama done right). Good screenwriters know that you only write what you see and hear. One of the challenges media tie-in authors face is creating an interesting story that breaks the status quo, novelize the characters, create stakes for the readers, yet not interfere with the canon in any way, shape, or form (good-bye character development). They can't just write what you see and hear, but also what you smell, feel, taste, and think.
Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder seem to know that, but have the wrong idea. There a lot of long-winded scenes describing the setting before getting into the meat of the scene, but that's the problem. There is so much focus on describing every little detail to replicate the show's setting that it becomes boring. There is no motivation as to why we have 3 pages of description other than, "This is where we are and what is here," nor is there any character in the narration.
Here's an example. Would you rather read...
Along the walls of the library were wooden bookshelves filled with books. A lot of them were on Demonology, since Giles was a Watcher.
Or...
Along the walls of the library were wooden bookshelves filled with... Well, books. And since no kid in school ever liked reading, Giles seemed very comfortable with putting his Demonology books on display.
Action Sequences
Here's a problem I noticed in more media tie-ins that I would like: When the protagonist is fighting the scene's villain and almost beats them not once, not twice, but THRICE in the same scene. Doing this trick once or twice to build tension and suspense works, but repeating the trick more than that just becomes tedious no matter how good your prose is (see 3 Days to Kill starring Kevin Costner (Or chapter 1 of this book)).
Final Verdict
I didn't hate this book and I don't blame anyone who loves it. My problem with it is that it's boring. I appreciate how the authors try to break the status quo by having a vampire that keeps resurrecting, but the villain is very flat and has no motivation for anything she does other than "I want the world to die." There are no personal conflicts between this villain and Buffy outside of "Slayer kill vampire but vampy won't die." If characters don't have solid motivations, then why should audiences be motivated to read about them?
Here's hoping the Gatekeeper Trilogy is good.
Define Books In Pursuance Of Immortal (Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9)
| Original Title: | Immortal |
| ISBN: | 0671041754 (ISBN13: 9780671041755) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Series: | Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Buffyverse Novels #29, Buffy - Im Bann der Dämonen #13 , more |
Rating Epithetical Books Immortal (Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9)
Ratings: 3.84 From 1442 Users | 45 ReviewsCriticism Epithetical Books Immortal (Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 3 #9)
this is one of the best buffy books in the series it seems to be more adult then the other ones. i found the story gripping and actually read it in one day. buffy seems to have grown up in this book and is trying to deal with major issues. i did find angel a little too broody in this book. i always reread this when i have nothing to readSeeing as I loved the Television series I also liked the books.
DNF at 53%This is supposedly one of the best Buffy novels out there, with the supposed dream team of Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. I can definitely see why the fanbase praises these authors, especially considering these writers come out with books at almost the same speed of Stephen King. However, though there is enjoyment to be found in this book, the vast majority of my reaction was "Okay, that was cool, but..."I'll do my best to break it down.Dialogue vs. CharacterChristopher Golden's
DNF at 53%This is supposedly one of the best Buffy novels out there, with the supposed dream team of Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. I can definitely see why the fanbase praises these authors, especially considering these writers come out with books at almost the same speed of Stephen King. However, though there is enjoyment to be found in this book, the vast majority of my reaction was "Okay, that was cool, but..."I'll do my best to break it down.Dialogue vs. CharacterChristopher Golden's
Corny. Silly me. I love Buffy though.
On completion of Tape One, I must say a few things: (1) I'm quite impressed with Charisma Carpenter's ability to capture the cadence and tones of nearly all the characters, with the exception of the absolute slaughter she has done of Giles' British Accent. Eep. (2) The story is pretty neat, and given a sub-plot of Buffy's mom being really ill in what would be around 3rd Season in the show, it's a nice foreshadow to the eventual plot conclusion of Joyce in the show. (3) The notion of an immortal
I was feeling a bit nostalgic for the days (years ago) when I loved BTVS and so when I saw this in a charity shop I thought I'd reminisce and I never read this one when it first came out. Unfortunately I picked totally the wrong Buffy book! This was written very much from the POV of the baddie and I felt like the characters weren't anything like I remember them being in the TV show around series 3. Buffy making Star Trek references (interesting bearing in mind Christopher Golden has written a
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.