Particularize Books Supposing Gideon the Cutpurse (The Gideon Trilogy #1)
Original Title: | Gideon the Cutpurse |
ISBN: | 1416915257 (ISBN13: 9781416915256) |
Edition Language: | English |
Series: | The Gideon Trilogy #1 |
Characters: | Peter Shock, Kate Dyer, Gideon Seymour |
Literary Awards: | Carnegie Medal Nominee (2009) |
Linda Buckley-Archer
Hardcover | Pages: 404 pages Rating: 3.72 | 6280 Users | 742 Reviews
Interpretation As Books Gideon the Cutpurse (The Gideon Trilogy #1)
1763.Gideon Seymour, cutpurse and gentleman, hides from the villainous Tar Man. Suddenly the sky peels away like fabric and from the gaping hole fall two curious-looking children. Peter Schock and Kate Dyer have fallen straight from the twenty-first century, thanks to an experiment with an antigravity machine. Before Gideon and the children have a chance to gather their wits, the Tar Man takes off with the machine -- and Kate and Peter's only chance of getting home. Soon Gideon, Kate, and Peter are swept into a journey through eighteenth-century London and form a bond that, they hope, will stand strong in the face of unfathomable treachery.

Declare Containing Books Gideon the Cutpurse (The Gideon Trilogy #1)
Title | : | Gideon the Cutpurse (The Gideon Trilogy #1) |
Author | : | Linda Buckley-Archer |
Book Format | : | Hardcover |
Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 404 pages |
Published | : | July 1st 2006 by Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing (first published January 1st 2006) |
Categories | : | Fantasy. Young Adult. Science Fiction. Time Travel. Historical. Historical Fiction. Fiction. Childrens |
Rating Containing Books Gideon the Cutpurse (The Gideon Trilogy #1)
Ratings: 3.72 From 6280 Users | 742 ReviewsEvaluation Containing Books Gideon the Cutpurse (The Gideon Trilogy #1)
I love Gideon! He's so awesome! He's definitely my favorite character. And oddly enough, I like Sidney. His character was very well written. I hate Kate. A lot. I really liked the story.DNF.I was bored. I am not that kind of person though that starts a book then isn't quite loving it so far and then puts it down. I'm not.This book was just, bleh.
First, I have to say, the cover of this book is great! It's a hardcover book with an opening actually cut out of it with the eye looking through. My kids love to touch it!Important note: there are two versions if the Gideon books. The British version and the American version. The first book is "Gideon the Cutpurse" (British version) and "The Time Travelers" (American version). The second book in the trilogy is "The Tar Man" (British version) and "The Time Thief" (American version). Be careful

So good! Loved it. The story, characters, writing, even the semi-logic behind the time travel were brilliant. Peter's father has important business to attend to and sends Peter with their housekeeper to her friend's family farm in the country. The Dyer family is a big family whose siblings are all very tight with one another. Dr. Dyer, a scientist, has an anti-gravity machine at his lab. When Kate, Peter, and Kate's dog, Molly, go with him to the lab, a accident with the machine sends Peter and
Not even close to Harry Potter and has nothing in common with it except children protagonists.
I picked this book up originally for two reasons. 1. The beautiful cover art sucks you in2. The cover blurb that states "For kids who love Harry Potter" - Entertainment WeeklyI might not be the target audience but I do enjoy young adult reads most of the time. The back of the book tells us that Peter and Kate manage to land themselves in 1763 due to an accident with an anti-gravity machine. They now somehow need to find their way back to their own time!This could have been wonderful but
I won't lie, I picked up The Time Travelers, part one in the Gideon trilogy, mainly because it had awesome cover art. James Jean is such a deadly awesome artist, and I was so excited that he'd illustrated a middle school book, I just had to read it.As a first book, The Time Travelers was a bit cumbersome. The story was a lot of fun and I was digging the characters, but I found her style was a bit stilted. It was almost as if she was attributing a 7 year olds' way of reading to her 9-13 year old
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.