Be Specific About Books Concering The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
| Original Title: | The Open Society and Its Enemies: 2. Hegel and Marx |
| ISBN: | 0415278422 (ISBN13: 9780415278423) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Series: | The Open Society and its Enemies #2 |
Karl Popper
Paperback | Pages: 470 pages Rating: 4.02 | 1975 Users | 72 Reviews
Declare Based On Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
| Title | : | The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2) |
| Author | : | Karl Popper |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 470 pages |
| Published | : | July 11th 2003 by Routledge (first published 1945) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Politics. Nonfiction. History |
Relation In Pursuance Of Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
Written in political exile in New Zealand during the World War II and first published in two volumes in 1945, Karl Poppers The Open Society and its Enemies was hailed by Bertrand Russell as a vigorous and profound defence of democracy. Its now legendary attack on the philosophies of Plato, Hegel and Marx prophesied the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and exposed the fatal flaws of socially engineered political systems.Rating Based On Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
Ratings: 4.02 From 1975 Users | 72 ReviewsEvaluation Based On Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
Well, that was a let down. The cranks on Hegel are worth the while, as is the question of the use of history in the last chapter, but everything else...meh. Popper's thoughts on Marx are like a new invention that protects you against spears: not particularly important anymore, because I can't recall the last time I met a legitimate Marxist. Communists, sure, but out and out Marxists? A thing of the past. Ironically, Popper spends a great deal of time justifying what I see to be the largestvery plausibly skips over 25 centuries to tie marxism directly into plato.
I personally found it more intriguing to read than the previous volume, part of the reason is I'm not familiar with Plato and Aristotle than that of Karl Max and Hegal. It's perhaps either incorrect notions of representation has existed over our culture like their hardliners used to say about it. Nevertheless, the ideas and concepts are distributed via various media outlets after all. I still feel that His attack on the particular concept is not always rigorous but occasionally the other are
This is the second part (the cover isn't correct, but oh well), and it's equally good. You should read this if you're uninspired to read anything else.
Many Marxists consider that knowledge is determined by cultural and social norms, but Popper rejects this idea as absurd. His main argument is that Marxists ignored famous examples from the history of science, such as Copernicuss heliocentric theory of the solar system that was created independently from the cultural prejudices of the sixteenth century. This leads us to the conclusion that scientific knowledge does not depend on society. Popper totally destroyed the so-called,,sociology of
- thinking in the solving problems need logics or an experience? - are we should trade one way? - are we all search for many answers at same time? - is there an answer without a question?
I had never heard of Popper until Ligeti used a title of his for his pieces "Clouds and Clouds". So when in a book store, i search it out but ended up buying this one . Now here was a philosopher who didn't need to use big terms to impress you. His language is as simple as he could make it. And he ask the really important question-how open in terms of individual rights does a citizen have within a society. He takes Plato as a starting point and shows how much he was against such an idea and how
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.