Specify Epithetical Books Being and Nothingness
| Title | : | Being and Nothingness |
| Author | : | Jean-Paul Sartre |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 688 pages |
| Published | : | August 28th 2003 by Routledge (first published 1943) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Classics. Cultural. France |
Jean-Paul Sartre
Paperback | Pages: 688 pages Rating: 3.96 | 25225 Users | 390 Reviews
Narration To Books Being and Nothingness
Being & Nothingness is without doubt one of the most significant philosophical books of the 20th century. The central work by one of the century's most influential thinkers, it altered the course of western philosophy. Its revolutionary approach challenged all previous assumptions about the individual's relationship with the world. Known as 'the Bible of existentialism', its impact on culture & literature was immediate & was felt worldwide, from the absurdist drama of Samuel Beckett to the soul-searching cries of the Beat poets.Being & Nothingness is one of those rare books whose influence has affected the mindset of subsequent generations. Seventy years after its 1st publication, its message remains as potent as ever--challenging readers to confront the fundamental dilemmas of human freedom, choice, responsibility & action.
Details Books As Being and Nothingness
| Original Title: | L'être et le néant |
| ISBN: | 0415278481 (ISBN13: 9780415278485) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Epithetical Books Being and Nothingness
Ratings: 3.96 From 25225 Users | 390 ReviewsComment On Epithetical Books Being and Nothingness
Reading being and nothingness, I got the sense Jean-Paul Sartre was trying to impress everybody by writing an unreadable book. He could sum up the entire book in three pages, an empty page on being and nothingness, one page on bad faith, and one page on the look. 800 pages, the guy had a huge ego. I understand why philosophers consider jean-Paul Sartre overrated, some call him an asshole, I agree. I could say Jean-Paul Sartre is in bad faith, trying to be a philosopher, he was not a philosopher.Do you like to read words? This book has alot.Maybe Sartre and I have a connection beyond the limits of consciousness.This took me a very long time to digest.What a book!
The problem i have with Sartre is he have conclusion before even exploring the topic. He only explore it to affirm his conclusion.Whether it be nausea or no exit whatever his idea(conclusion) he only explore it to conclude an imaginary cul-de-sac!
This book has an insaine amount of technical jargon, all made the more worse is that its translated from the French into English, so you will obviously loose something along the way. However, all one needs to do is read some introductory works on Sartre and Being and Nothingness to get that technical stuff simplified. You just gotta remember en-soi is objects within the world (the world in general) and pour-soui is human consciousness.What I love about this book is that it sets up an
L'etre et le neant, essai d'ontologie phenomenologique = Being and Nothingness, Jean-Paul SartreBeing and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, sometimes subtitled A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, is a 1943 book by the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, in which the author asserts the individual's existence as prior to the individual's essence and seeks to demonstrate that free will exists. While a prisoner of war in 1940 and 1941, Sartre read Martin Heidegger's Being and Time
Ive taken time on ideologically heavy books before, spending sometimes an hour on a single page to make sure I really understood, but I took 5 months on this 800 page beaut. I read Being And Nothingness in conjunction with an incredibly enlightening and comprehensible book of course notes by Paul Vincent Spade from Indiana University on the subject of Sartre and B&N. See http://pvspade.com/Sartre/pdf/sartre1.... What they say about B&N is true. It was VERY difficult. Sartre uses ideas
The only time I ever passed out in my life was during the reading of this book. I actually felt and heard my brain pop and awoke on the floor next to the couch.This is an extremely difficult text. I recall spending an entire week on just one paragraph. I still do not fully understand this work but will eventually have to revisit it to complete something I am writing on Free Will.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.