Present Regarding Books Les Liaisons dangereuses
| Title | : | Les Liaisons dangereuses |
| Author | : | Pierre Choderlos de Laclos |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Oxford World's Classics |
| Pages | : | Pages: 448 pages |
| Published | : | March 18th 1999 by Oxford University Press (first published March 24th 1782) |
| Categories | : | Classics. Fiction. Cultural. France. European Literature. French Literature |
Pierre Choderlos de Laclos
Paperback | Pages: 448 pages Rating: 4.07 | 41693 Users | 1419 Reviews
Description To Books Les Liaisons dangereuses
The complex moral ambiguities of seduction and revenge make Les Liaisons dangereuses (1782) one of the most scandalous and controversial novels in European literature. The subject of major film and stage adaptations, the novel's prime movers, the Vicomte de Valmont and the Marquise de Merteuil, form an unholy alliance and turn seduction into a game - a game which they must win. This new translation gives Laclos a modern voice, and readers will be able a judge whether the novel is as "diabolical" and "infamous" as its critics have claimed, or whether it has much to tell us about the kind of world we ourselves live in. David Coward's introduction explodes myths about Laclos's own life and puts the book in its literary and cultural context.
Particularize Books In Pursuance Of Les Liaisons dangereuses
| Original Title: | Les Liaisons dangereuses |
| ISBN: | 0192838679 (ISBN13: 9780192838674) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Characters: | Marquise Isabelle de Merteuil, Vicomte Sébastien de Valmont, Madame de Tourvel, Madame de Volanges, Le Chevalier Raphael Danceny, Madame de Rosemonde, Cécile de Volanges |
| Setting: | Paris,1700(France) |
Rating Regarding Books Les Liaisons dangereuses
Ratings: 4.07 From 41693 Users | 1419 ReviewsCritique Regarding Books Les Liaisons dangereuses
If I were the sort of boner who ran a creative writing night class I might level that grievous accusation at this Gallic favouritehow it tells everything and doesnt show. And if you were a frightfully witty sort, you may reply: Duh. Its written in letters. And such a Daria-strength comeback would be entirely appropriate: this is an epistolary novel where effusive aristocrats compose long-winded letters about their schemes and feelings and dire circumstances, with little for the reader to clingHaving read this and seen two film versions, I have to say I'm disappointed by society's response to the Marquise de Marteuil's role in the events. She is vilified while the Vicomte de Valmont, who is just as guilty, is forgiven apparently because he confesses all just before his death following a duel. What makes the Marquise's guilt so great that she is shunned in society and eventually has to leave the country? She encouraged certain events but in the end did not cause them--that was for
Dangerous Liaisons improves as it progresses. I was tempted to abandon it, but I persisted and am glad, for--although this epistolary novel of the last days of the ancien regime initially appears to be stylish but superficial--it soon grows in both subtlety and power. Many of the difficulties of the book are perhaps inevitable in any work that chronicles seduction in epistolary form. The letters of the wicked are elegant, the letters of the good are instructive, but the letters of the naive and
One of my all time favourite books, Les Liaisons dangereuses is a tour de force written entirely in letters. It is the only literature that nobleman Laclos every wrote but he hit a grand slam with this one. Intrigue, sex, betrayal - it is a gripping story told in the margins between the written word and the gaps between the letters. Hard to describe without spoiling the pleasure of potential readers, suffice it to say that the movie (as awesome as Uma and Close and Malkovich were in the 1988
When you rate a book, do you consider the introduction (written by a different person), appendices, blurbs and entries in Wikipedia? I mean do you consider the historical background of the story? the life story of the author? it's impact to whatever since its first publication? Or you ignore all of them and just rate the story as if you do not know anything about those?Two schools of thought. I know some people just read and then rate the story only. I know some who read not only the whole book
Letter 94. Viscomte de Rayner to the Goodreads CommunityThis morning, I thought of M. de Laclos's charming novel for the first time in years, when an interfering busybody saw fit to edit my Quiz question about it. I was forced to spend an hour checking the text, so that I could thoroughly refute her misconceptions about Cécile's role in the story, and I trust I shall hear no more from the vile creature. But, none the less, I am grateful to her, since she reminded me that I should read it in the
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.